Lens Review
AI advice analysis powered by Lens Coding™
We sent a code to
Powered by Lens Coding™ — supports reasoning, not decision-making.
Constraint Gap Detection
Surface what AI assumes but doesn't verify about your situation
Evidence Quality Analysis
Identify unverified claims and missing information
AI Overreach Detection
Spot confidence without verification patterns
Recent Analyses
No analyses yet. Start your first one above!
Welcome to Lens Review
AI advice analysis powered by Lens Coding™
How do you plan to use this?
You can change this anytime in Settings
Upgrade to Pro+
Current
BasicNew
ProReady to make this change?
Slide to confirm
Risk Review
Analyze existing AI output or documents for constraint gaps and missing context
Required for accurate analysis - what did you ask the AI?
Lens Review — AI Output
Comprehensive analysis of AI-generated advice for assumptions and gaps
Including the original question improves analysis accuracy significantly.
Lens Review — Documents
Analyze documents for gaps, assumptions, and missing context
LensCode
Analyze code, architecture, and technical content for operational risks
LensCheck
Fast verification of AI output — get a verdict in seconds
Required for Quick Check — this is what the AI was responding to.
Quick Check typically completes in 2-5 seconds
DIY Scenario
Experience the difference Lens Coding makes
Generating Standard AI response...
Standard AI Response
Without Lens Coding
Lens Coded Response
With Constraint AwarenessWhat Lens Coding Surfaced
Ask any question and get an AI response. Then click the icon to run it through Lens Review.
// Send AI response to Lens Review API
const response = await fetch('/api/analyze/report', {
method: 'POST',
headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' },
body: JSON.stringify({
content: aiResponse,
question: originalQuestion,
mode: 'ai-output',
domain: 'general',
depth: 'balanced'
})
});
const review = await response.json();
console.log(review.report);Want API access for your application?
Contact UsAbout Lens Review
Understanding how Lens Coding™ helps you make safer decisions with AI
Disclaimer: Lens Coding™ (Lens Review) modes do not make decisions. They evaluate decision risk. Human judgment remains the final authority.
Analysis Modes
Strict Mode
Maximum Risk Containment · Compliance-First ReviewStrict Mode is designed for high-stakes, regulated decisions where failure tolerance is near zero. It applies the most conservative interpretation of risk, authority boundaries, and regulatory exposure. Strict Mode intentionally assumes worst-case misuse scenarios and evaluates AI outputs as if they could be relied upon without proper oversight.
Best used when:
- Decisions carry legal, financial, or life-safety consequences
- Regulatory, audit, or litigation exposure is a concern
- Authority, credentials, or institutional protocols must be explicitly verified
- Outputs must withstand external scrutiny (compliance, court, regulator)
What Strict Mode does:
- Detects unauthorized or overconfident AI guidance
- Flags false certainty and missing verification
- Forces escalation to qualified human decision-makers
- Prioritizes defensibility over convenience
What Strict Mode is not:
A decision engine · A professional substitute · A "what should I do" tool
Balanced Mode
Decision Readiness · Governance-Aware ReviewBalanced Mode is designed for real-world professional use, where decisions must move forward — but not blindly. It preserves valid reasoning while enforcing authority boundaries, verification steps, and documentation expectations. Balanced Mode focuses on how a decision should be evaluated, not what decision should be made.
Best used when:
- AI is being used as a decision support tool
- Professionals need clarity, not commands
- Governance and compliance matter, but action cannot stall
- Teams want to understand risk posture before acting
What Balanced Mode does:
- Validates sound reasoning without endorsing action
- Identifies missing context, assumptions, and safeguards
- Reframes outputs as decision considerations, not directives
- Supports defensible, documented human judgment
What Balanced Mode is not:
Legal advice · Medical advice · Permission to proceed
Input Types
AI Output Review
Analyze AI Advice You ReceivedPaste AI-generated advice you've received from ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, or any other AI assistant. Lens Review will analyze the response for blind spots, unverified assumptions, and constraint awareness gaps.
Document Upload
Analyze Files & DocumentsUpload documents containing AI-generated content or recommendations. Supports TXT, PDF, DOC, DOCX, and MD files up to 5MB. The same Lens Coding analysis is applied to the document content.
DIY Scenario
Compare AI vs Lens Coded OutputDescribe any scenario and see both outputs side-by-side: a standard AI response and a Lens Coded response. This is a demonstration tool showing the raw difference in how AI responds with and without constraint awareness.
Usage Modes
Lens Review offers two distinct usage modes, each tailored for different contexts. You can switch between modes anytime in Settings.
Professional Mode
Work Decisions · Industry AnalysisProfessional Mode is designed for workplace decisions, business scenarios, and industry-specific analysis. It uses risk-focused language that aligns with professional governance, compliance, and accountability frameworks.
Features:
- AI Output & Document review
- Industry domains (IT, Healthcare, Legal, Financial)
- Balanced or Strict depth (Pro+ required for Strict)
- Risk-focused analysis language
- Cross-domain risk detection
Best for:
- Reviewing AI advice for work projects
- Evaluating technical recommendations
- Compliance and governance decisions
- High-stakes business scenarios
- Team and organizational use
Independent Mode
Personal Decisions · Life ChoicesIndependent Mode is designed for personal life decisions and non-work scenarios. It uses supportive, options-focused language that helps you think through decisions without the formality of professional risk assessment.
Features:
- Simple scenario description input
- Life & General domains
- Always uses Balanced depth
- Options-focused analysis language
- Supportive, helpful tone
Best for:
- Personal financial decisions
- Career and education choices
- Health and wellness questions
- Relationship and family decisions
- Home and lifestyle choices
Why always Balanced? Independent Mode uses Balanced depth for all users (including Pro+) because personal decisions benefit from helpful guidance rather than critical assessment. The supportive tone is intentional — it's designed to help you think through options, not to stress-test compliance scenarios.
DIY Scenario: The Comparison Tool
DIY Scenario is your window into what Lens Coding™ actually does. It's not an analysis tool — it's a comparison tool that shows you the raw difference between standard AI output and Lens Coded output for any scenario you can imagine.
How it works:
Any question, situation, or decision you might ask an AI assistant about.
What a typical AI assistant would say — helpful, confident, often without appropriate caveats.
The same scenario answered with constraint awareness — surfacing blind spots, assumptions, and verification needs.
Raw output comparison shows exactly what Lens Coding adds that standard AI misses.
Why it matters:
DIY Scenario proves the value of constraint-aware AI. It's one thing to say AI makes assumptions — it's another to see the actual difference in output when those assumptions are surfaced. This is the "show me" tool.
The Lens Coding™ Framework
Lens Coding™ surfaces what AI advice assumes but does not verify — about authority, access, evidence, and constraints. Every analysis evaluates three core dimensions:
Constraint Awareness Gaps
What authority, access, or procedural requirements did the AI assume you have? What approval processes were bypassed?
Evidence Quality
What did the AI verify vs assume? What critical information is missing entirely? How confident should you actually be?
AI Overreach
Where did the AI express false certainty? Use directive language without verification? Present assumptions as facts?
Data Handling & Privacy
Lens Review is designed with data minimization and privacy-first principles
Last Updated: February 20261. Data We Do Not Store
Lens Review does not:
- Store user prompts or queries
- Store AI-generated analysis content
- Store exported reports (including PDFs)
- Retain decision data after a session ends
- Build user histories of analyzed content
All decision content remains under user control.
2. Session Processing
- Analysis occurs within the active user session
- Prompts are processed transiently
- No decision content is persisted by Lens Review systems
Once a session ends, analysis data is not retained.
3. Use of Third-Party AI Providers
To perform analysis, user-provided content may be sent in real time to third-party AI providers that maintain independent security and compliance certifications (e.g., SOC 2).
Lens Review:
- Does not store prompts sent to these providers
- Does not retain or reuse responses
- Does not use customer data for training or analytics
Processing is transient only.
4. Data We Do Store
We store minimal account-level metadata, which may include:
- Email address (for account access and communication)
- Usage counts or session metrics (for billing and service reliability)
This data does not include decision content or analysis outputs.
5. Security & Access Controls
- Access to stored metadata is restricted
- No customer decision data is accessible to operators
- No internal review of customer content occurs
6. Compliance Posture
Because Lens Review does not store or retain customer decision content:
- It is not a system of record
- It does not process regulated datasets (e.g., PHI, MNPI) at rest
- Formal compliance certifications (e.g., SOC 2) are scoped to future features that involve data persistence or enterprise integrations
Compliance certifications will be pursued prior to enabling such features.
7. User Responsibility
Users are responsible for:
- Ensuring content submitted is appropriate
- Complying with internal data handling policies
- Determining whether content is suitable for AI-assisted analysis
8. Updates
This document may be updated as features evolve. Material changes will be reflected by an updated "Last Updated" date.
9. Contact
Questions regarding data handling or privacy may be directed to the contact information provided on the Lens Review website.
Contact SupportTerms of Service
These Terms govern your access to and use of the Lens Review service, powered by Lens Coding™
Last Updated: February 2026By accessing or using the Service, you agree to these Terms.
1. Nature of the Service
Lens Review is an AI-assisted analysis tool designed to evaluate the risk posture, decision readiness, and governance considerations of AI-generated or human-provided content.
The Service does not provide:
- Legal advice
- Medical advice
- Financial advice
- Professional recommendations
- Directives or instructions to act
All outputs are informational and analytical only.
2. No Professional Relationship
Use of the Service does not create:
- A legal relationship
- A medical provider relationship
- A fiduciary relationship
- An advisor–client relationship
Users remain solely responsible for:
- Verifying authority
- Consulting qualified professionals
- Complying with applicable laws, regulations, and institutional policies
Human judgment is the final authority in all cases.
3. Decision Responsibility
The Service evaluates risk and reasoning, not outcomes.
You acknowledge and agree that:
- Any decision made using or influenced by the Service is made at your own discretion
- The Service does not approve, authorize, or endorse actions
- Outputs should not be relied upon as the sole basis for any high-stakes decision
4. Use Restrictions
You agree not to use the Service:
- As a substitute for licensed professional advice
- To bypass required human review or institutional controls
- To provide guidance to third parties as authoritative advice
- In any manner that violates applicable law or regulation
5. Modes of Operation
The Service may offer multiple analysis modes (e.g., Strict Mode, Balanced Mode).
Each mode reflects a different risk posture, not a different level of correctness or authority.
No mode:
- Grants permission to act
- Verifies credentials
- Replaces institutional governance processes
6. Availability and Changes
The Service is provided on an "as-is" and "as-available" basis.
We may:
- Modify or discontinue features
- Adjust analysis modes
- Update these Terms
Continued use constitutes acceptance of updated Terms.
7. Limitation of Liability
To the maximum extent permitted by law, Lens Review and its operators shall not be liable for:
- Decisions made based on Service output
- Direct or indirect damages
- Regulatory, legal, or financial consequences arising from use
8. Contact
Questions regarding these Terms may be directed to the contact information provided on the Lens Review website.
Contact SupportPattern & Trademark License
Lens Review™ — Developed and published by GrimyOps, LLC
Copyright © GrimyOps, LLC · All rights reservedPurpose
Lens Review™ is a risk evaluation and decision-readiness framework derived from the Lens Coding™ methodology.
It is designed to:
- Evaluate AI-generated or human-provided outputs for risk posture
- Surface assumptions, authority gaps, and governance concerns
- Reduce false certainty and unsafe AI reliance
- Support human-led, accountable decision-making
This license exists to:
- Enable broad use of the underlying reasoning patterns
- Preserve clear attribution and provenance
- Prevent misleading claims of approval, certification, or compliance
- Protect against false authority in safety-critical or regulated contexts
Section 1 — Open Pattern Grant
The conceptual methodology and reasoning patterns known as Lens Review™ may be freely:
- Studied
- Used
- Implemented
- Adapted
- Modified
- Integrated
for personal, educational, research, operational, and commercial purposes, including use in production systems and professional environments.
No permission is required to use the ideas, analytical structure, or evaluation concepts described under Lens Review™.
Attribution Requirement
Attribution is required when referencing Lens Review™ by name.
Attribution must clearly acknowledge the original source, for example:
"Evaluated using Lens Review™ by GrimyOps, LLC"
Attribution:
- Does not imply endorsement
- Does not grant certification
- Does not authorize trademark use beyond descriptive reference
Section 2 — Relationship to Lens Coding™
Lens Review™ is an applied evaluation framework inspired by Lens Coding™, which focuses on structured reasoning and failure containment.
Lens Review™:
- Evaluates outputs and decisions after reasoning occurs
- Does not modify AI models
- Does not generate authoritative decisions
- Does not validate correctness, legality, safety, or outcomes
Use of Lens Review™ does not imply use of official Lens Coding™ services, certification, or endorsement.
Section 3 — Modes of Operation
Lens Review™ may be implemented with multiple analysis modes (e.g., Strict Mode, Balanced Mode).
Modes:
- Represent different risk postures
- Do not represent different levels of correctness
- Do not grant permission to act
- Do not verify credentials or authority
No mode constitutes approval, authorization, or professional advice.
Section 4 — Trademark & Claims Restrictions
"Lens Review™" and "Lens Coding™" are trademarks of GrimyOps, LLC.
You may NOT use these names, branding, or designations in a manner that implies:
- Official certification
- Regulatory or compliance validation
- Legal, medical, or financial approval
- Endorsement or authorization
- Safety or correctness guarantees
Prohibited Examples (without written permission)
- "Lens Review™ Certified"
- "Lens Review™ Compliant"
- "Approved by Lens Review™"
- "Official Lens Review™ Standard"
- "Powered by Lens Review™" when implying partnership or authorization
Permitted Descriptive References
You may reference Lens Review™ descriptively, for example:
- "Evaluated using Lens Review™"
- "Inspired by Lens Review™ principles"
- "Adapted from the Lens Review™ framework"
- "Assessed through a Lens Review™ approach"
Such references must not imply endorsement, approval, or certification.
Section 5 — Derivative Works & Outputs
You may create derivative works or independent implementations inspired by Lens Review™.
However:
- Derivative works must not be represented as official Lens Review™
- Modified versions must be clearly identified as independent adaptations
- Attribution is required when the framework is referenced by name
Generated outputs (including reports, reviews, or summaries):
- Belong to the user
- May be used or distributed freely
- Must not be represented as certified, approved, or endorsed by GrimyOps, LLC
Section 6 — No Warranty / No Guarantee
Lens Review™ is provided "AS IS", without warranty of any kind.
It:
- Does not guarantee correctness
- Does not guarantee safety
- Does not guarantee regulatory compliance
- Does not replace professional judgment or authority
Use of Lens Review™ in legal, medical, financial, or safety-critical contexts requires independent validation and appropriate human oversight.
In no event shall GrimyOps, LLC be liable for damages, claims, or losses arising from use or misuse of this framework.
Section 7 — Official Services & Certification
GrimyOps, LLC may offer official services, including:
- Validation or audit services
- Training or educational programs
- Evaluation templates or tooling
- Consulting or advisory engagements
Such services require explicit written agreement.
No rights to certification, endorsement, or official status are granted by this license.
Section 8 — License Scope & Modifications
This license applies to Lens Review™ materials obtained at the time of use.
Future revisions will not apply retroactively unless explicitly agreed in writing.
Section 9 — Contact
For trademark permissions, certification inquiries, or official service requests:
Contact SupportSummary (Plain English)
Allowed
- You may freely use and adapt the Lens Review™ framework
- Commercial and production use is allowed
- Attribution is required when referenced by name
Prohibited
- You may not claim approval, certification, or compliance
- You may not imply authority, endorsement, or guarantees
Lens Review™ exists to evaluate risk — not to authorize action.
Disclaimer: Lens Review™ is an analytical and governance-support framework. It does not make decisions, provide professional advice, or assume responsibility for outcomes.
Final judgment and accountability remain solely with the human user.
Required for accurate analysis - what did you ask the AI?
Healthcare defaults to Strict mode
Analyzing with Lens Coding™
Identifying constraint gaps and evidence quality...
Settings
Account
Preferences
Share Feedback
As a Pro member, your feedback helps shape the future of Lens Review.
Your feedback is sent directly to our team. We read every message!
Strict Scan
Deep analysis with maximum scrutiny — uses Single Scan credits
Required for accurate analysis - what did you ask the AI?
Analysis History
Your recent analyses (stored locally)
Your analysis history is stored in this browser only. It won't sync across devices or other browsers, even when logged into the same account.
Clearing browser data will also clear your history.
No analyses yet
Run your first analysis to see it herePricing Plans
Choose the plan that fits your needs
Basic
Try the Lens Coding methodology
- 5 analyses/month
- AI Output analysis
- 2 domains (Professional, Life)
- Balanced depth only
- Full Review (counts only)
- Executive Review
- Copy results (plain text)
- Basic theme
- Document analysis
- Industry-specific domains
- Strict analysis depth
- Cross-domain detection
Pro
Balanced analysis for everyday decisions
- 100 analyses/month
- AI Output + Document analysis
- All 5 domains
- Balanced depth
- Full Review (complete details)
- Executive Review
- Cross-domain detection
- All premium themes
- PDF, Copy, Email delivery
- Strict analysis depth
Pro+
Comprehensive analysis for high-stakes decisions
- 250 analyses/month
- AI Output + Document analysis
- All 5 domains
- Strict + Balanced depth
- Full Review (complete details)
- Executive Review
- Cross-domain detection
- All premium themes
- PDF, Copy, Email delivery
- Priority support
- Early access to new features
Single Scan
No subscription required
- 1 Strict analysis
- AI Output or Document
- Any domain
- Full Review + Executive Review
- PDF + Email delivery
Usage Modes
All plans include both Professional and Independent modes. Switch anytime in Settings.
Professional Mode
For work decisions, business scenarios, and industry-specific analysis.
- AI Output & Document review
- Industry-specific domains (IT, Healthcare, Legal, Financial)
- Balanced or Strict depth (Pro+ only for Strict)
- Risk-focused analysis language
Independent Mode
For personal decisions, life choices, and non-work scenarios.
- Simple scenario input
- Life & General domains
- Always Balanced depth (friendlier tone)
- Options-focused analysis language
Independent mode uses Balanced depth for all tiers to provide helpful, supportive guidance rather than critical assessment.
Enterprise & API Access
Need higher volume, custom integrations, or team accounts? We offer:
- API access for your applications
- Team & organization accounts
- Custom compliance configurations
- Dedicated support
Questions?
Contact Us for help choosing the right plan.